 Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2008 September
2008 August
2008 April
2008 March
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
My Links
Dovetailmyth
BIOMIMICRY
The Natural Step
Alliance For Sustainability
almsthvn blog
DeathbyGlitter's Blog
DanielMacDonald's Blog
dr forbush blog
enki blog
h2Opower blog
graceshaker blog
Howie Luvzus Blog
jerneedog
jt blog
kurtmaddox blog
nullfactor blog
pourquoi Pas? blog
Ruined's Blog
Rand's Blog
rosietulips blog
Shayno blog
surrogate blog
SweetSue
UserFriendly
TabooTenente's Blog
wil wheaton blog
Something Wicca This way Comes
WEST*MART ethical local partnerships Blog
* WORK LESS PARTY, comsume less, live more!
Witchcraze *Not so fun facts*
History of Salem Witch Trials
US Army Chaplain's Handbook RE: Wicca
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
Blog Posts of Note: *Magic, Witches and the Bible
*A brief History of Wicca
*Wicca 101 part 1
*Wicca 101 part 2
*Spells and the Modern Witch
*Do Witches Worship Satan?
*Religious View
*Interview with a Witch
*A Witch's Story of Creation
*One Definition of the Divine
*I am a Witch
* Original Sin, from a Witches point of View
*Why a Witch Could care less about Harry Potter
*Satan is not my Sidekick
*The other people: Or how I learned to stop worrying and love the Bible
I put this link here.
Committee to Protect Bloggers

Something Wicca This Way Comes I feel so special right now, look Ma! I won an award!
|
| Time for Charity |
| 08.31.05 (2:08 pm) [edit] |
More action... less blogging.... :D
Well, living in Vancouver BC keeps me pretty far removed from tragedies like hurricane Katrina, and even though I know lots of fellow bloggers in the states, again most of them weren't affected either. But then this morning I got a little note from my friend Longshot http://longshot.tblog.com/.
I didn't even remember that he lived in New Orleans, well, he did. Doesn't anymore. He and his family are fine, but their house is gone. Until I learned that I’ll be honest I hadn't given much thought to the hurricane. Sure I watched the news and stuff, but it was faceless to me. Now it has a face, one of my friends. So here I am way far away thinking what can I do... if I was closer I could offer my spare room and fold out couch, but it’s a bit of a drive. So here’s what I can do and what I encourage all my fellow bloggers to do the same.
It's likely some of the other bloggers we know out there were touched by this tragedy too, so here’s my suggestion go to the Red Cross site, donate, then post at your blog that you've done it and encourage your readers to do the same.
http://www.redcross.org/" title="http://www.redcross.org/" target="_blank"http://www.redcross.org/ <--- go here to donate. > yupper i've donated what i can to the red cross. your turn now!
yes I'm reposting the same post under a different title. I'm a little dissapointed to see how little the 'religion' section of tblog has said about the Need for Charity at this time. A little bit of name calling I know, but everyone Claims to be good christians, so what are you DOING to show the world your Christian Chairty?
If you've already donated or done something to help out, post about it! Tell people, get people motivated to do something themselves!
FM
|
|
|
| |
| To PastorDave and Kurt Maddox, and everyone else who visits my blog |
| 08.31.05 (11:54 am) [edit] |
Reply to: kurtmaddox You and pastordave seem to be having a great time, I’m just going to step back and let you two go at it! I’m not getting involved here. It's fun to read and watch. I enjoy the huge amount of intelligence being swung around here these days. It's refreshing to spend time with such smart people (I mean ALL of you, who drop by of a visit, chat or full throttle debate :D )
Smart people aren't a dime a dozen ya know, just look at nullfactors neighbours, I’m enjoying being surrounded by intelligent conversation.
Right now my son is wandering around the house flicking his tongue in and out of his mouth while making a noise in the back of his throat, it sounds like he's about to swallow his tongue and a bit like the sound one of my cats makes just before she pukes.
I need this! I need these conversations and mental stimulation!
Thanks,
but Kurt, lay off the references to me being like Jesus, that freaks me out!
lol :D
FM
I’ve decided to step back and not interfere in their conversation. For a few reasons one, I don’t really have anything to add, and I still have a head cold and I’m now very confused as to who said what and whether the respect each other, or whose planning to take out a hit on who.
LOL just kidding I do think that both of them agree on the statement “violence is not the answer”, I think? Do you?
Anyways, over the next week or so I will have to disappoint and not write interesting blogs, sorry nullfactor, because the 3 day Literary Novel Contest is rearing its ugly head again and as I’ve said before, then procrastinated about it, my focus is needs to be on my novel. Good ole Canadian Literature.
So just what is Canadian literature? Do we have such a thing? Yuppers we do and to be honest, it’s crap.
I actually have an extreme aversion to what today’s great literary critics called good Canadian literature.
So I’m not really sure why I’d going to subject myself to writing in that style.
The freaky thing is this: yesterday I was talking with my partner in crime- another writer who will also take on this years contest, again about Literature in Canada. She pulled out her “how to be a Canadian” a very tongue and cheek book about all the strange ways we Canuck’s have and how they differ from other countries. Yup until this book was published we Canadians were often at a loss when asked “What makes a Canadian – Canadian?” more often that not, our standard reply was “we’re not American.”
But now we have this book, there’s a Tim Horton’s Donut on the cover.
In this book there a very accurate description of Canadian Literature. The frightening point to this story is that as my friend read this section to me over the phone I realized that the novel I propose to write this weekend fits to a T.
I don’t own the book, but I’m getting a copy from the library tomorrow, I’ll inflict all its painful prose on you then. Until then, see my post below and help out!
FM
I still owe pastordave a review of Mere Christianity, it is coming, but may be awhile, thanks for you patience.
We also have a good description of ourselves from the infamous beer commercial for Molson Canadian beer. An average joe Canadian says the following Joe's speech goes like this:
Hey.
I'm not a lumberjack, or a fur trader, and I don't live in an igloo or eat blubber, or own a dog sled, and I don't know Jimmy, Sally or Suzy from Canada, although I'm certain they're really, really nice.
I have a Prime Minister, not a President. I speak English and French, not American, and I pronounce it 'about', not 'a boot'.
I can proudly sew my country's flag on my backpack. I believe in peacekeeping, not policing; diversity, not assimilation; and that the beaver is a truly proud and noble animal.
A toque is a hat, a chesterfield is a couch, and it is pronounced zed: not zee – zed!!
Canada is the second largest land mass! The first nation of hockey! And the best part of North America!
|
|
|
| |
| Longshot and the Hurricane |
| 08.31.05 (10:25 am) [edit] |
Well, living in Vancouver BC keeps me pretty far removed from tragedies like hurricane Katrina, and even though I know lots of fellow bloggers in the states, again most of them weren't affected either. But then this morning I got a little note from my friend Longshot http://longshot.tblog.com/. I didn't even remember that he lived in New Orleans, well, he did. Doesn't anymore. He and his family are fine, but their house is gone. Until I learned that I’ll be honest I hadn't given much thought to the hurricane. Sure I watched the news and stuff, but it was faceless to me. Now it has a face, one of my friends. So here I am way far away thinking what can I do... if I was closer I could offer my spare room and fold out couch, but it’s a bit of a drive. So here’s what I can do and what I encourage all my fellow bloggers to do the same. It's likely some of the other bloggers we know out there were touched by this tragedy too, so here’s my suggestion go to the Red Cross site, donate, then post at your blog that you've done it and encourage your readers to do the same.
More action... less blogging.... :D
It doesn't matter how much even 5$ is something. If I knew your real name Longshot, I would have made my donation in your name. But since I don't please know that I was thinking of you and your family while visiting the Red Cross site and making my On Line (and very easy to do) donation.
http://www.redcross.org" title="http://www.redcross.org" target="_blank"http://www.redcross.org to the american red cross
FM
|
|
|
| |
| jeepers! |
| 08.31.05 (6:20 am) [edit] |
all i can say is whats with all the writing my prolific blogging friends!? I've never come on to tblog and seen such llllooooonnnnnggggggggg comments... anyways I'm about to take my kiddo to his friends house for a play... when we return i'll read everything! :D and respond, unless the eye strain kills me.
Fm
|
|
|
| |
| Are Polish people offended by shoe polish? |
| 08.30.05 (10:04 am) [edit] |
Are Polish people offended by shoe polish?
Okay I have a head cold, I’m not feeling that great so even though what I’m about to say may not make any sense to you, it does to my fevered brain so bear with me.
How did I come up with this thought? Well we’ll start with the commercial I saw on TV yesterday.
This woman is out on a date with a friend’s brother. She’s thinking to herself about how cute he is, how sweet and kind he is and then he barks, “arf arf” and she thinks, “I hope is bite is as good as his bark”.
It was a commercial for the Tourettes Syndrome Foundation or something like that. Basically the point was people with Tourettes are people too, and I completely agree, except this commercial was so badly made and so cheesy that I had to laugh. I wondered how long it would be until ‘SNL’ or “This Hour has 22 Minutes” (Canada’s SNL) would be making fun of it.
Then my brain thought, Are we allowed to make fun of Tourettes?
Remember that really old Simpson’s episode where Bart says something offensive and then when he gets in trouble says he has Tourettes?
Well a huge hoopla was made about that comment, people we offended by it, especially people with Tourettes and their friends and family. I don’t remember the exact story I just remember thinking the Simpson’s makes fun of everything, but after that Tourettes was off limits.
Anyways at this point my brain has forgotten about that commercial and is thinking about the Simpson’s and how much I enjoy the show. I think it’s really funny and I like that nothing is safe, they make fun of everything, nothing is sacred.
They have made fun of every religion, political party, country, pop culture icon etc… and I love it. I laugh when they make fun of Canada and I laugh when they make fun of Wicca.
An example: paraphrased
Bart makes a snide comment about Lisa’s earth based religion.
Lisa says “it’s called Wicca”
Bart says “whatever. Its just a Hollywood fad”
“that’s the Cabbala, you idiot” Lisa shouts back.
I don’t remember the rest, or the context that sound bite was a part of, but I laughed. It was good.
Another example: I just saw the commercial for it.
Bart’s overweight and had a heart attack or something.
Homer says (paraphrasing here) “kids shouldn’t have heart attacks they should be free to run and play and skip and jump and get eaten by Witches.”
Theoretically I, as a good witch, should be utterly offended by the continued defamation of my faith in pop culture. Like the people who freaked out about the Tourettes reference I have every right to be offended that such an offensive statement was made. We DON”T eat children! We’re mostly vegetarians” my placard could say. I could mount a campaign to Boycott the show, have it cancelled, or have that specific show never shown again.
But I’m, in fact I found it pretty funny and still chuckle a little when I think of it. I know that the fairy tale definition of Witches is very different than what modern Wicca is and so statements like that, or statements like the one my neighbour made about another neighbour being a ‘witch’, when she really meant ‘bitch’ don’t offend me, or bother me in anyway. I know that they are using an alternate and completely legitimate definition of the word. And generally, like Homers comment I think its funny.
I was trying to think of a decent comparison, but all I could come up with was “polish”. I’m assuming that when Polish people see bottles of shoe polish they aren’t offended; they know they are two very different things. I’m assuming that “spit and polish” doesn’t carry derogatory connotations to Polish people. They’re not thinking, “What? Spit on Polish [people]”. Just an assumption, I could be wrong, but is my point making it across?
Polish and polish are spelt the same, but are two very different words. With two very different meanings, but people know them, both of them. That’s not the case with Witch, at least not to the general population. I know, it’s not the best comparison because they are pronounced differently, but I was having some troubles here.
Another word comparison that might work would be Weird. But it doesn’t quite fit either because it’s old meaning- something a kin to fate or destiny, its used anymore and most people only modern definition as odd, strange, bizarre. But it sort of works because it has an ‘old meaning’ and a ‘new meaning’ like the word witch.
So yes I’m weird, new meaning, because I’m sitting here wondering if Polish people are offended by shoe polish.
If anyone can think of a good word that would fit, post it! Kay?
FM
|
|
|
| |
| Simply |
| 08.27.05 (9:15 am) [edit] |
A little story.
The other day I was playing out in the yard with my son. I had my camera with to take some pictures of him playing with his trucks and enjoying the summer weather. A little girl from down the street, she’s about 9, wandered down to our house to play with the Ruler. She often does that when she’s bored and wants to practice her babysitting skills.
I went into the house to make lunch. I trust her enough to watch the Ruler, while I’m still close enough in case of “real trouble”. I put the camera down on a chair and thought nothing more of it until later in the day, closer to dinner time, when I was cleaning up. I picked up the camera and saw that most of the film was finished. “Uuummmm, I don’t remember using that much film,” I thought to myself. I shrugged my shoulders, I guess I did.
I took the film in to be developed a few days later and was quite surprised when I got the film back. A dozen or so pictures were all of the trees in my back yard. Each was taken from a different angle and perspective.
As I was looking at these remarkable shots I realized they were all of one tree, each different, so different in some that it was hard to tell, but sure enough that little girl had created many different images of the same thing.
So in the end I had many man-made images showing the aspects of one thing.
For me God is that Simple.
PastorDave wrote [in a comment]:
“You must know there is no room, absolutely none, within basic Christianity for more than one God. It is a stalwart of Judaism, upon which Christianity is built and sees itself as the completion of the Jewish faith. Our God will accept no rivals. One cannot be a polytheist and a Christian. It is not compatible. Of course a person can claim to be, and to believe, anything they please. But all claims to truth are not equal. And when you throw out the Inspiration of the Bible, then the basis of your beliefs becomes self. But, Christianity insists that you set aside self as the king of your life and your beliefs, and place Christ upon that throne.”
What you say is true, to a point. As I talked about before in my last post there are many different types of Christianity in the World today. I do not, and will not dispute that what you say is true for your type of Christianity. However, the Christianity I grew up with does not insist that in any way.
Also as I’ve said before and as I illustrated in my fable above I do not believe in the polytheism. I believe in One God. I Believe all Gods to be One and only how we perceive that One God differs.
The Bible is a wonderful Spiritual sacred text and I do not throw out its inspiration. I do believe that the bible is inspired by man’s relationship with God, but I also believe that to be true of other sacred works.
I do not believe the Bible as literal truth. There have been to many human hands rewriting, translating, and other wise implying their own perspective, culture, and desires onto the that book, along with other sacred works. Humans are fallible; as such our works will have some distortion as a result.
I do not believe that anyone can truly know what God really wants us to believe. I am quite willing to state that “yup I could have it wrong”, but so could everyone else, so until I have God, in person, visit me and tell me to “shape up” or “you go girl” I’m going to keep doing what I’m doing and forge ahead with my faith in All Gods are One God.
PastorDave wrote at his blog http://www.tblog.com/template...: “Chapter 11 seems, to me, to be a less than adequate attempt to show Wicca/Witchcraft as a great, historic, defining religion of mankind. A quote from p. 103 describes the message of the author: “…Present-day witchcraft…represents a resort to a magical philosophy that is quite ancient and has been significant in various historical periods of ideological transition in Western history.” I can accept that magic and religion have always been important aspects of human behavior. But I think it is a stretch to search history, find efforts and writings about magic, and decide to just claim them as part of a unified religious movement.”
On this we agree. I don’t believe that Wicca is some ancient religion rediscovered. What I do believe is that Modern Day Wicca was created by Gardner approx 60 years as a reconstruction of old and sacred rituals, texts, documents etc from the past. How does that differ? Not a lot I’ll grant you.
Wicca, being so young is absorbing information and writing itself as we go. I watch my son pick up behaviour and information, he takes it within himself and redefines it to work for him and his personality. Wicca is in the process of doing the same thing.
Wicca is young. When Christianity was only 60 years old I’m sure it was doing similar things, redefining as it worked out the kinks, so to speak. Like all religions it didn’t pop out fully formed. Each religion needs time to age and educate itself, like children.
This doesn’t make Wicca any less sacred, just young. All religions were new at one time.
PastorDave wrote http://www.tblog.com/template...: “The writer, many times, goes to great extent to disassociate Witchcraft from Satanism. But all of these other occultic practices and directions are encouraged. Yet, many of them are linked to Satanism and demonism. How can you “dance” so closely and yet never be connected?”
To answer this question would take a very long time I think and mean a lot more writing and reading, on both our parts. The occult practices such as tarot, divination, astrology etc… that you may see to be associated to Satanism, we do not. We do not believe in Satan at all. So those practices are not in anyway associated to a creature that does not exist. Many pagans see Satan as a Christian construct created to be like the boogie man, a creature to ‘scare you in to behaving” or a creature created to discredit Pagan deities such as the Horned God, Pan and the Green Man. All of whom bear a striking resemblance to Christians Satan, but are not evil.
Since we’ve already established that all Gods are one, then if there is a deity Satan, he two would be an aspect of the One God. An archetype of human’s fallible nature, our mischievous side and such. The less desirable aspects of our nature would be personified in such a Deity. But he is still One God, so we’re in a paradox that even Satan isn’t evil.
If you haven’t all ready I suggest you read my “do witches worship Satan" http://www.tblog.com/template... article and my “magic, witchcraft and the bible" http://www.tblog.com/template... article for more info about it.
PastorDave quoted from the book http://www.tblog.com/template...: “As one American witch said in response to the question, how does one become a witch? ‘Say you are a witch 3 times, & you are a witch’.”
I think the context was meant to be a bit quipy for that quote, yet as you mentioned there are Christians who are born into a Christian household, and therefore Christian-in away, but not until they put their beliefs in to practice to they become “true Christians” .
I think the same can be said for pagans/wiccans. You can dance around in a circle and say it three times, but if you know nothing of the actually faith how ‘good’ witch are you?
Most groups require a wannabe witch to practice within the faith for a year and a day before dedicating themselves to the faith. The year allows the person an opportunity to experience all the major holidays and the day to day life of being a witch. If after that year they are still interested and haven’t forgotten about their practices, a dedication ritual is held.
I don’t know why it’s a year and “a day”, probably to attempt to match up with the exact calendar date of your initial choice to practice.
Most groups also require you to be ‘of age’ before doing so, or at least have your parent’s permission, if you are a teen. Many pagan parents will hold ‘blessings’ for babies and children, but they do not dedicate their children, because that’s a choice each person must make themselves.
In my desire to have simplicity I feel that the comment of “just saying it three times and it is so” is a nice one. To make a simple statement of faith can be as powerful as creating the big hoopla of a ritual. When we commit our life to another human being we say “I do” simple and direct. Sure there’s often a lot of junk to fill in the time until the food arrives, but this basic statement is what counts.
So why not have such a straightforward relationship with the Divine?
For a lot of this I don’t have answers for, I’m still figuring it all out myself. I’m not sure I need answers, as that infamous cliché says “it’s the journey that counts.”
I’ve read more of CS Lewis, but this post has already gotten really long so I’ll save it for my next writing time. :D
|
|
|
| |
| To Pastor Dave regarding his commments about Never Again. HI! |
| 08.26.05 (1:41 pm) [edit] |
Again I have to say a BIG THANK YOU for being so willing and open towards this book. I sat down this afternoon and reread chapters six and part of seven. What you need to understand about those chapters is that, well what you were reading was like the Catholicism of Wicca, the first run and very ritualistic type of Wicca.
Where as my version, “the sanitized” version as you state, is more of a Unitarian sort of Wicca. Wicca falls under the umbrella of Paganism, but there are many, many subcategories of Wicca under that title too. Celtic Wiccan, Eclectic Wicca, Solitary, Green Witchcraft, etc…
Protestants are under the umbrella of Christianity, and Anabaptists under that of Protestant. then under Anabaptist you have Mennonite, Amish, Hutterite. Compare a Mennonite service to Catholic mass and it would be hard to believe they are both ‘Christian’. The same can be said for Wicca as well.
A lot of what Loretta says “witches believe” in those two chapters are new to me, and not a part of what I believe or practice. It was a surprise to read the seven hermetic principals that witches believe because before reading this book I’d never heard about them. I believe similar things, but not them as they stand.
This is where Wicca and Christianity differ. Christians have the unifying, organization of having the Bible. Sure, different sorts interpret the words in the bible differently, but every Christian church you walk into will have some version or another of the book.. Christianity as a result is organised.
Wicca is not. We don’t have a unifying source, other than our belief in a Divine. Event then, not everyone agrees on how to term such a ‘thing’ (for lack of a better word, at this time). Each group, style, coven, circle, or community of pagans/witches/Wiccans/ follow different books, or no book at all. They may draw on Egyptian myth, Norse myth, Native American myth, whatever, but no two groups are alike, which is the reason there are so many.
This is why the Wicca I’ve described in my writings is very different from the Wicca in the book. It doesn’t make mine, or theirs any less important, just different.
To answer some of the questions you asked:
"I have not researched the subject, but I will bet there are adherents to Wicca who practice a dark form of their faith."
Sure there are night witches, but they are not evil. as you are implying with the word dark, just honour the dark side of us all the balance of light and dark in the day and night, seasons and personalities.
"Are spells not cast intending to bring harm upon others?"
No. they are not. If there are people doing so they are not Wiccan and would be looked upon with disrespect by all Wiccan’s.
"Have human sacrifices never been made?"
To be quip, how many people were sacrificed in the name of your God over the years? In the past I’m sure druids or the like, conducted human sacrifice. But that has nothing to do with Modern Day Wicca. It doesn't happen in modern times. Besides a lot of Wiccan’s are vegetarian, vegan even!
"Don't some adherents align themselves with Satanism?"
If people choose to do that they are not Wiccan. They are Satanists and not the same at all.
"Are some of the gods not harmful deities?"
Sure. There was Loki always getting the other Gods into trouble. Zeus was sorta a jerk. A bunch of the Mesopotamian Gods was really nasty, but then again the God of the Old Testament wasn’t all love and sunshine either. So I’m not sure how this applies, again to Modern Day Wicca. Just because they existed doesn’t mean we did or do worship them.
“We are talking about a religion here. The deities followed by Wicca are not compatible with the Christian faith. There is a huge difference, incompatible I think.”
How so? Many Wiccan’s believe they are one and same. Many believe that The God of the Bible is as much a personification of the Higher Divine, as Diana and Pan are.
Many Wiccan’s believe in the Universal Divine, unknowable, indescribable. Humans with their need and desire to have relationship with that divine personified It into a form that could be understood and was compatible with the society in which they lived. They put aspects of personality into their Deities that they required for their belief structure. Hence there’s the God of the Old Testament, who is very different, yet is the same God in the New.
The Hebrews needed that sort of God it fit with their society, yet as the times changed, as people and their morals, ethics, beliefs and world changed God changed too, to fit with what the people of Jesus’ time needed.
The same can be, and is often said, of the Roman Pantheon, the Norse, Celtic and Native American. They all come from the same source but fit the needs of the people who believe in them.
Even today God of Christianity is different depending on the type of Christian you are. To some God is an all powerful father figure, who had his own son killed for his sins. He wants everyone to believe they were born sinners, will live their lives as sinners, have sinners for children and die sinners. Yet the same Christian God in other types of Christianity is Love, Peace, and Compassion. There is no original sin, no need to repent because you are born saved. He fits into the societies, sects of faith who need him to be a certain way. Who’s right in this example?
Please do not read my words with a hostile intent. I do not in any way want you to feel that I am attacking or being nasty in anyway. Again I admire your willingness to read with such an open mind. As a result of this exchange my own personal beliefs are becoming more and more concrete. I am thinking about things from a different perspective and with different eyes. While yes I would call this a challenge to do, it is a worthwhile one and glad to participate in.
|
|
|
| |
| GAS WAR |
| 08.26.05 (7:11 am) [edit] |
A friend forwarded this post to me. Sounds like fun to me, and easy enough to do... pass it on...
FM
GAS WAR!!!
IT HAS BEEN CALCULATED THAT IF EVERYONE IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA DID NOT PURCHASE A DROP OF GASOLINE FOR ONE DAY AND ALL AT THE SAME TIME, THE OIL COMPANIES WOULD CHOKE ON THEIR STOCKPILES.
AT THE SAME TIME IT WOULD HIT THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY WITH A NET LOSS OF OVER 4.6 BILLION DOLLARS WHICH AFFECTS THE BOTTOM LINES OF THE OIL COMPANIES.
THEREFORE SEPTEMBER 1st HAS BEEN FORMALLY DECLARED "STICK IT UP THEIR BEHIND " DAY AND THE PEOPLE OF THESE TWO NATIONS SHOULD NOT BUY A SINGLE DROP OF GASOLINE THAT DAY.
THE ONLY WAY THIS CAN BE DONE IS IF YOU FORWARD THIS E-MAIL TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS YOU CAN AND AS QUICKLY AS YOU CAN TO GET THE WORD OUT.
WAITING ON THE GOVERNMENT TO STEP IN AND CONTROL THE PRICES IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. WHAT HAPPENED TO THE REDUCTION AND CONTROL IN PRICES THAT THE ARAB NATIONS PROMISED TWO WEEKS AGO?
REMEMBER ONE THING, NOT ONLY IS THE PRICE OF GASOLINE GOING UP BUT AT THE SAME TIME AIRLINES ARE FORCED TO RAISE THEIR PRICES, TRUCKING COMPANIES ARE FORCED TO RAISE THEIR PRICES WHICH EFFECTS PRICES ON EVERYTHING THAT IS SHIPPED. THINGS LIKE FOOD, CLOTHING, BUILDING MATERIALS, MEDICAL SUPPLIES ETC. WHO PAYS IN THE END? WE DO!
WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE. IF THEY DON'T GET THE MESSAGE AFTER ONE DAY, WE WILL DO IT AGAIN AND AGAIN.
SO DO YOUR PART AND SPREAD THE WORD. FORWARD THIS EMAIL TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW. MARK YOUR CALENDARS AND MAKE SEPTEMBER 1ST A DAY THAT THE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA SAY "ENOUGH IS ENOUGH"! Have A GREAT Day.....
|
|
|
| |
| put this is your pipe.... |
| 08.25.05 (4:21 am) [edit] |
... you know the rest.
it was well after 1 am before tblog allowed me to post what i wrote last night, while i don't actually regret it the 'morning after', in 'the harsh light of day' i feel i little silly.
I've been wandering around tblog, reading the blogs of my new found friends boomster http://boomster.tblog.com/ and boomersangel http://boomersangel.tblog.com... They've had quite a bit of action at their homes lately all this considered. I'm not sure now much i want to jump in to the fray, but I admire their strength and courage as well.
I'm very sleepy today, the ruler was wide awake at 550 am approx four hours after i finally fell asleep last night... it's going to be a long day...
in other news I want to say congratulations! to the minister of my chruch who's wife (also a minister in the United Church) is having a baby! due dec 29- xmas services could be interesting this year. :D
Oh, did i mention that my minister is also a woman?
|
|
|
| |
| can a pagan convert to judaism?-- and other late night thoughts |
| 08.24.05 (9:50 pm) [edit] |
It’s very late and although I am very tired I can’t fall asleep. I’ve been laying awake thinking about all sorts of things. Mostly religion and my relationship to it, my faith and all sorts of big issues that at this time of night I can’t put into words.
I’ve also been thinking about Redtigress’s http://redtigress.tblog.com/ post about Jews in Israel and what I think about all of that. I’m not really sure I mean I’m a white Anglo Saxon protestant (okay pagan) living in suburban Canada- I could read every news report, all the history books, talk to every single Jew, Israeli, Palestinian, I can lay my hands on and I still wouldn’t know shit about being a Jew (or Palestinian) in the middle east.
I’m having a crisis of faith. I’m lying in bed thinking that God, the higher power, the Divine, whatever doesn’t mean for this religion thing to have all us humans so constipated. Yes you heard me, constipated- it should be a strain as to who’s right whose wrong; who’s getting into heaven and who getting left behind. We’re all running around here trying to figure it all out. Stuck and bloated clinging to our beliefs with just a grasped hand we can't let go. When really i don't think there's any thing to figure it just needs to be. It just is. (the Buddhist in me comes out when I'm sleepy)
I don’t subscribe to CS Lewis's view that religion needs to be hard for it to be worth having. It just doesn’t make sense to me. I can’t understand religion when you have basically similar ideas i.e. the golden rule, religions that are supposed to be about love and then some big Whig says assassination is a good thing? How does that fly with Jesus’ teachings?
Anyway that was a rhetorical question and I’d rather not start a fight about it here, thanks.
There’s something uncomfortable in the world right now and I feel like we’re all on the verge of something huge and it scares the shit out of me. It feels like the calm before the storm, the gearing up before an attack, and I don’t mean anything terroristy, yet the word ‘pogrom’ comes into my head regularly.
I need to get this out say it all then maybe I can sleep. I’m scared of it, scared of being a side issue when one ‘extremist’ side (whoever they end up being -Xtains or Muslim, or aliens from outer space, it doesn’t matter) goes after the minority, the perceived evil -be they Xtains, Gays, Jews, Muslims, again doesn’t matter, I’ll be that side issue, “oh round up the pagans too, cuz neither side likes them.”
(Please note that I said “extremist” I am in no way implying that ALL people of these faiths are like that, I’m not that far gone in my paranoia)
It makes me want to hide away all my books, erase all my work on the computer, delete files, make blogs and websites disappear and distance myself from my cyber pagan alter egos Fairmoon and the others. “Nope, that’s not me. I’m nothing, no faith and certainly not a dirty little pagan. Of that I know better”, lie though my teeth, not because I lack conviction to my faith, but because the life of my son is more important that how I believe in God, who right now, as of this moment, I’m pretty damn sure doesn’t exist.
As I lay in be thinking all this, wondering will I catch the warning signs soon enough to erase my life, I thought of Redtigress and her post. It started be wondering about being a Jew. Sometimes I really want to wear a Star of David, I love the symbolism of that star, there is so much tied to it. Not just the history of Judaism, the fact that it is so balanced, two triangles, special symbols in my own faith, merged and becoming one.
I think about the bravery of people who in the past HAD to wear it and know that I have no ‘right’ to that symbol and yet thinking of it brings me peace.
I think of all the shit- there’s no other way to say it at 1230 am the morning- Jews in history have gone through, from the pogroms in Russia to the holocaust, From the inquisitions to the anti- Semitism in North America to being blamed for everything that has very gone wrong in the world. They are the dog that has been kicked into the corner time and again, yet they have the strength, the will, the -I don’t know the right word- to not hide, to not disappear and keep their faith in secret.
Somehow they always find the courage to stand back up and stand in the middle of a mall on Dec 23rd and shout “I am a Jew” (I worked with a girl who did that one year, xmas commercialism was getting to all of us, her most of all) and I want the courage. I want to know where that comes from, and how I can get it.
As much as some of the kindly xtains out there would like to see their little pagan playmate safely back into the fold of Christ, if I was to convert, or revert or change my wily pagan ways I would find strength in Judaism, I would feel safer in that haven, if they would have me. The big question is would they?
Tomorrow when I wake up I’ll think of this post as I do that angry email I wrote after drinking a lot and should have waited until sober to send. I am not drunk as I write this, stone cold sober, tired and afraid. I could just not post it. Save it to a file, or just erase it completely, yet what true blue, dyed in the wool blogger would to such a thing? I am a writer and an exhibitionist writer to boot. (I’ve been researching clichés for my novel, my apologies) so I post this well aware of the – I don’t know what this may cause in the morning.
I can’t sleep and my brain is trying to purge itself so I can find some peace.
Where I will find that peace I do not know.
|
|
|
| |
| stuff |
| 08.24.05 (12:33 pm) [edit] |
I was going to mop the floor but my hubbie ‘put away the mop’ and I can’t find it.
I have finally figured out a big chunk of my next novel. But I can’t talk about it yet. Thanks to my friends C and H for their help.
I’ll be getting my novel Bitter Waters, back from the editor soon, and be able to post a first chapter.
I will be able to read more of the books in the book swap challenge tomorrow.
I got my kid registered for Preschool- a year in advance- otherwise he might not have gotten in.
I start school again in September, three nights a week this time. Uck!
I hhmmmm… don’t have much more to say.
I’m a nerd, see below.
|
|
|
| |
| nerd test |
| 08.24.05 (12:15 pm) [edit] |
Pure Nerd 78 % Nerd, 39% Geek, 30% Dork | For The Record: A Nerd is someone who is passionate about learning/being smart/academia. A Geek is someone who is passionate about some particular area or subject, often an obscure or difficult one. A Dork is someone who has difficulty with common social expectations/interactions . You scored better than half in all Nerd, earning you the title of: Pure Nerd. The times, they are a-changing. It used to be that being exceptionally smart led to being unpopular, which would ultimately lead to picking up all of the traits and tendences associated with the "dork." No-longer. Being smart isn't as socially crippling as it once was, and even more so as you get older: eventually being a Pure Nerd will likely be replaced with the following label: Purely Successful. Congratulations! | | |
My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender: | You scored higher than 88% on nerdiness | | You scored higher than 59% on geekosity | | You scored higher than 54% on dork points |
|
|
|
|
| |
| serious Graphic Artist needed |
| 08.22.05 (5:20 am) [edit] |
Serious Graphic Artist Needed
I can maneuver my way around graphic arts okay, but I’m having issues with my latest project, the cover of my new book. What I need is a Graphic artist who can put together an image for the cover. I know want I want, or at least have a pretty good idea, I just can’t do it myself. So if you like being told what to do, this could be the job for you.
Requirements my graphic artist needs to have:
The big one: FREE I can’t pay you squat. Nada, nothing. Got it? What you do get out of the deal is your name, design company name, email, website, whatever printed on the back cover of the book saying who did such a cool job designing the cover. You’ll get you name etc in the ‘acknowledgements’ section too.
Second: you’ve got to be good and able to prove it. Show me some of your work.
Third: not be squirmy, sensitive, offended by books that get the label Erotica. While my book isn’t of that genre, and the cover certainly won’t be ‘graphic’ in anyway. I fear that my book will get tossed into thatsubcategory. It’s either that or ‘romance’ and if given the choice I’ll choose Erotica. So you have to be okay with your work connected to a book ‘like that’, okay? Fourth: did I mention I can’t pay you? I’ll ask you to sign (how we’d do that over email I don’t know) one of those affidavit thingies saying you won’t sue me later cuz I didn’t pay you squat for your work. There are no royalties in it for you, just my undying gratitude and respect, and some free advertising. I’ll toss in a free copy of the book when it’s done, for you to show off to your friends if you want, and if you aren’t squirmy, sensitive, or easily offended- see number four.
Five: it’s likely that I’ll use the graphic you create for me for cards, posters, flyers, and other advertising paraphernalia, which I haven’t worked out yet, so in a sense you’ll have to willing hand over the copyright of your work to me so I can legally use it all over the place (crediting the source of course), again another reason for some sort of written agreement so you don’t sue my poor ass. And I mean poor; I have zilch money, that’s why I need this work for FREE, please!
If your interested in being completely used (yes you will be left with that ‘used’ feeling in our stomach, and possibly the taste of peppermint in your mouth- read the book and you’re get that reference), with only a few decent benefits, are a GREAT graphic artist, aren’t the suing type, and have some free time to do the work (theoretically what I want shouldn’t take long to put together) over the next month or two (hopefully publication date is Jan 2006) send me a Private message.
There requirements are subject to change, without notice, as I remember other details I forgot to write down in this ad.
Bitter Waters
Coming Jan 2006
For anyone who reads this and is interested in being updated as my book publishing thing moves along, email bitterwatersthenovel@hotm ail.com to get added to the mailing list. And don’t worry I’ll never give, sell, or otherwise abuse email addys given to me. You will only get junk mail about my book, and nothing else. Promise.
As of right now the book is at the editors, after editing is complete a blog will be created for viewing the first chapter of the Book. When it’s up, I’ll send an email to the people on the mailing list- see that’s what I’ll use the list for, stuff like that.
|
|
|
| |
| Mere Christian Forgiveness (part 4 of ?) |
| 08.19.05 (8:57 am) [edit] |
My reading this morning was all about Forgiveness, CS Lewis style. I’m skipping over writing about the part of the book that talked about Christian Marriage because my mom taught me that if I can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all.
I found the Forgiveness part very -what’s the word, I just told alms that I lost all my words this morning and it appears to be true- I guess timely, I hope the thesaurus has a better word for it. The thesaurus suggests- opportune, fitting, or auspicious.
Yesterday Null was writing about his nasty neighbours, who would be damn hard to ‘forgive’ for any numbers of the crap they’ve pulled on him and his family, and yet this section of forgiveness is all about finding forgiveness for just these sorts of people and how hard it is.
To forgive, doesn’t mean you let the person off the hook. You can still hate the actions or sins of the person, just not the person themselves. That’s a tough paradox to come to terms with, when your family has been screwed around; Taking the sinner out of the sin and seeing them as two separate things. The belief is that you “love your neighbour as you love yourself.” What does that mean?
“Do I think well of myself, think myself a nice chap?” Lewis asks. “Well, I am afraid that sometimes I do, but that is not why I love myself. In fact it is the other way around: my self-loves make me think myself nice, but thinking myself nice is not why I love myself. So loving my enemies does not appear to mean thinking them nice.” He also says, “However much I dislike my own [faults] I went on loving myself.” So if we are to love our neighbour as we love our self, we can dislike their actions as much as we dislike some of our own.
He goes on to say that forgiveness also doesn’t mean a person shouldn’t be punished for their actions. When someone commits a crime, they still need to serve their time, and take responsibility for their actions. But again it’s the actions that require the punishment, not the person themselves.
It’s tough, I don’t know if I could separate the two. I do love myself, there are things I’ve done that I’m not proud of, but I do love myself and although it doesn’t always work I do try to love my neighbours as myself. Isn’t that selfish though? (rhetorical question)
I do not think that selfishness is wrong. Loving ones self is crucial. If we do not love ourselves, how can we love others? It seems that when someone talks of compassion, they have the notion that entails a total disregard for ones own interest-a sacrificing of ones interests. This is not the case. In fact genuine love should first be directed at oneself.
Lewis, didn’t say that, I’ll tell you who did in a minute. Lewis said something pretty similar in his book, which made me think of that above quote and the stuff I will write below.
My other writer goes on to say:
To be genuine, compassion must be based on respect for the other, and on the realization that others have the right to be happy and overcome suffering just as much as you. On this basis, since you can see that others are suffering, you develop a genuine sense of concern for them.
I’m thinking ofNull right now, and I’m pretty sure he’s saying “yeah right, bite me!” and I don’t blame him, I’m thinking the same thing about his neighbours. (They are really awful people) I don’t think this is something that just happens. It takes time and a hell of a lot of practice.
Genuine compassion is based on the recognition that others have the right to happiness just like yourself, and therefore even your enemy is a human being with the same wish for happiness as you, and the same right to happiness as you. A sense of concern developed on this basis is what we call compassion; it extends to everyone, irrespective of whether the person’s attitude toward you is hostile or friendly.
Null still considering some well placed termites around his neighbour’s house, or some dirty worms in the pockets of the laundry on the line.
I just thought it interesting that these books, some blogs and me all sort of came together and I’m wondering, “if I had neighbours like Null does, could I do as these writers suggest?” I’m not attempting to change his mind, or the way that he views his neighbours, but wondering could I change my mind? Forgive, as Lewis suggests, find compassion as the Dalai Lama requests?
I’m really not sure, just something interesting to ponder.
|
|
|
| |
| Doukobors and hutterites 2 |
| 08.18.05 (9:57 am) [edit] |
Found an answer to my last question at this sitehttp://www.castlegar.com/tour..., here are the highlights:
The Doukhobors base their religious philosophy on the Law of God which consists of two commandments: "Recognize and love God -- the spiritual Force of Goodness and Creativity with all thy heart, mine and soul"; and secondly, "Love thy neighbour as thyself."
"What is God?" they are asked, to which they respond: "God is a word, God is spirit, God is love." "What is soul?", to which they say: "The soul of a person is the reflection of God's spirit in that person. Where there is love between people, that is where God dwells."
The Doukhobors understand Jesus Christ to have been born as a normal human being and to have lived and died in the flesh. His example exists into eternity. He arose in spirit and continues to arise in those people who follow his teaching, not in word but in deed. The Doukhobors believe that Jesus, both in his teaching and his life, showed that the meaning and purpose of life is to do good (meaning, fulfilling God's law of love). They believed that God's law is manifested through loving attitudes between people. The attainment of such attitudes, in the true sense, would mean renunciation of all violence and wars and the attainment of a life of peace and goodwill, a true heaven on earth.
I think a lot of people would agree with that.
Possibly their highest development and achievement was manifested by the Doukhobors at the end of the 1800s. Inspired by the high ideals and dynamic leadership of Peter Vasilevich Verigin together with some brave individuals who were willing to take a conscientious stand on matters of belief and practice, the Doukhobors made a decisive move against militarism and all forms of violence. On Easter Sunday, Matvey Lebedev and ten of his officers serving in the reserve battalion at Elizavetpol began rejection of war by refusing to go to church parade and dropping their guns and their military insignias. "War", they said, "was incompatible with Christianity, and Christ had commanded them "Resist not him that is evil." The men were arrested, beaten to submission, threatened with death, then seen to Siberian exile.
This brave example was followed in June 29, 1895 with some 7000 Doukhobors burning all their weapons, as a symbolic act marking the total renunciation of the taking of life. Alcohol and tobacco were rejected because they serve to harm the body; it was also an argument of support for the expected persecution that would follow.
The tsarist state and church authorities reacted strongly against the ban on killing; instead, they tortured and exiled these Russian dissidents, and took away their normal freedoms. Many people died, Suffering of such proportions attracted world wide attention, and with the help of humanitarians such as Lev N. Tolstoy and the Society of Friends (Quakers) one third of the persecuted Doukhobors were able to emigrate to Canada as "as a home away from home, a haven, a refuge".
another good site with info http://www.civilization.ca/cu...
|
|
|
| |
| Doukobors and Hutterites. |
| 08.18.05 (8:08 am) [edit] |
While engaged in the process of researching my next novel I’ve come across some amazing information. I love reading this stuff and just had to share it.
My friend shared with me her family history of being a Hutterite, she herself wasn’t but her mother was. This lead me to do some research on this little know sect of Christianity. They are similar to the Amish and Mennonites and fall under the category of Anabaptists. Meaning they baptize members of their churches at adulthood, not in infancy. (Or so some websites tell me) following the internet trail I ended up at wikipedia who had this to say about them http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Down at the bottom was a link connecting them to Doukobors. I love saying that word. Anyways, I’ve always heard about Doukobors, but never really know what they were all about, so Click… and off I went. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... You can follow the link or read a section I cut and pasted below:
They reject several items considered orthodox among Christian churches, including church organization & liturgy, the inspiration of the scriptures, the literal interpretation of resurrection, the literal interpretation of the trinity, and the literal interpretation of heaven and hell. They avoid the use of alcohol, tobacco, & animal products for food, and involvement in partisan politics. Doukhobors believe in the goodness of man and reject the idea of original sin.
The religious philosophy of the Doukhobors is based on two commandments: "Love God with all thy heart, mind and soul" and "Love thy neighbour as thyself." The Doukhobors have several important slogans. One of the most popular, "Toil and Peaceful Life," was coined by Peter V. Verigin.
What wikipedia doesn’t answer is Why? Why did these people chose to reject these major principles of Christianity? I’m off to find out, I’ll let you know what I find out, or if you know the answer please comment.
I love journeys like this!
|
|
|
| |
| niffy, even quizilla's right |
| 08.18.05 (4:35 am) [edit] |
 you are a wiccan, which means that you worship the earth and everything on it. You believe that magic is not black nor white, its what you make it. Good luck with your work and blessed be!
what sort of Witch are you? ( with PICS ) brought to you by Quizilla
don't forget I have a new article up at Timeless Spirit Magaizine. Check it out. http://www.timelessspirit.com...
Be sure to read some of the other articles there too. They're all good!
enjoy
FM
|
|
|
| |
| New Article |
| 08.16.05 (5:15 am) [edit] |
I have a new article up at Timeless Spirit Magaizine. Check it out. http://www.timelessspirit.com...
Be sure to read some of the other articles there too. They're all good!
enjoy
FM
|
|
|
| |
| there's something in the air... |
| 08.15.05 (10:21 am) [edit] |
And I think it’s autumn. There’s just a little something different in the breeze that’s coming in my door today. The sun is still bright, but not as hot. It’s as if the trees and the plants and the air know that autumn is coming… I love that feeling.
I’m one of those people who generally say their favorite season is which ever season it happens to be at present. Yet really truly this time of year is my favorite. It’s still warm, bit the hint of warm sweaters are in the air. I can wear my jeans all day and not be to hot, but if I chose shorts instead I wouldn’t be to cold. Everything is waiting, anticipating the long rest of winter and even though my plants are growing with continued gusto they all know it’s the last hurrah before winter.
Mabon, the autumn equinox is in a few weeks. The time between Lammas and Mabon is that of preparation. People would have been preparing for winter, bringing in the harvests, and canning, drying and stockpiling food for the cold days that are crawling in on the back of the wind.
I don’t need to do that, but I do have to prepare to go back to school. Yuk! I know, but then I do love learning so the whole back to school thing is kinda fun. More I feel like my body is preparing to settle down into the winter months where we’ll be inside more. It’s a time of more introspection. As we enter the dark cycle of the year, the dark half on the wheel, it’s a time to rest, relax and think.
I’m also in prep for publishing my novel and writing a second. I need to focus on this next novel, so I’ll not be around as much. In theory anyway, it’s likely I’ll still be around regardless.
Mere Christianity- as I said in a comment to surrogate that I agree with Lewis on a large chunk of what he wrote about morality and human nature. I do not agree however that Christian morality is somehow superior to non Christian. It’s a matter of humanity, not religion that makes us moral or not.
The Island- I went with the hubbie to the movies this weekend. What’s with all the stupid commercials even before the previews?
I really enjoyed this movie. The non so subtle commentary of the evil possibilities of human cloning we’re lost on us, regardless of the holes in the plot line. Similar to the pace, style and action of I, Robot (the last movie I saw in the theater), slightly over the top, but enjoyable nonetheless. And we had free tickets and free babysitting! It was good to get out.
Uummmm lets see what else am I thinking about today? I’m thinking about a nap now that the kiddo has gone done for a nap. Maybe I’ll find inspiration for this character in my new book while I’m napping?
|
|
|
| |
| Mere Christianity 3, my thoughts about about |
| 08.13.05 (6:10 am) [edit] |
Mere Christianity 3 (I think)
I’ve finished the section on what Christians believe and moving into Christian behavior. I’ll be honest, I’m trying very, very hard to enjoy this book, or at least finish it. Again, as I’ve said before it’s not the content- in fact I finally found a decent explanation to that whole Christ dying for you thingy which I can understand, more anon- but gleaning it out from among the babble and ramble is well a Challenge.
CS’s beliefs are very black and white. There is either right or wrong and no room for grey area. And His beliefs are Right.
This is where my beliefs, and general pagan beliefs, and his beliefs differ greatly. I see, and enjoy exploring, the mystery of that shaded grey area and see little excitement towards exploring faith if you can sum up a faith into a list of right and wrong. To me, that leaves no room for possibilities, growth and advancement. It’s stagnant and ‘finished’. What else is there to explore if it’s as straight forward as he states? (rhetorical question)
PastorDave, you’ll find when you read the Pagan book, that pagan beliefs are as broad and individual as the people involved. None of us believe exactly the same thing. There are lists of thing “neo pagans” are into, but not all of us are into all of them. And in some areas we disagree greatly.
There’s a quote in chapter five of “Never Again” (the pagan book PastorDave and I are reading) which seems apt for me to mention at his point. “[Neo-paganism] takes the position that a god or goddess is immanent in the material world including within the self; Fundamentalism [Christian] asserts that God controls humans from a distance. The Earth-healers emphasize inner freedom and personal interpretation. The fundamentalists prefer authoritarian collective religion.”
Paganism, Wiccanism, encourages the creation of personal belief within a structure. Whereas I view the type of Christianity that Lewis talks about the structure is set and there’s very little wiggle room.
I grew up with in a Christian church with a lot of wiggle room. Christianity to Lewis is an open and shut case, it is or it isn’t. You are or You’re not. I don’t like being told what to believe, I like to learn and then think about it myself. The Christian Church that raised me didn’t preach, but told the stories in a way that one could work out there meanings themselves.
There are certain aspects to Christianity that I never even knew existed until I was older, there weren’t a part of the Christian faith of the United Church. Does that make this church any less Christian? Some may say yes, but it’s the second largest church in Canada (after Catholicism, I think) so clearly they’ve got something right.
One of the big things, at least Lewis is making a big deal about it, ands it’s a big topic at discussion boards and some blogs is this “Jesus died for you” “Jesus saves” thing. This was not a part of my Christian upbringing. We learned in Sunday school that “Jesus loves you” “Jesus is peace” “Jesus is love” and that if I very got scared singing “Jesus loves me” or saying the Lords Prayer would protect me. Actually I sang “silent night” when I was scared of the dark, but you see what I mean. So I’ve never understood this “died for my sins” aspect of Jesus. (We didn’t talk much about sin either at church) so it is good to finally read an explanation of that idea that I can understand.
(I edited out some of the babble the ‘…’ mark where I skipped over some writing. The ‘[ ]’ marks where I slightly altered text, within context)
Lewis says:
You may ask what good it will be to us if we do not understand it. [Speaking of Christ’s death] A man can eat his dinner without understanding exactly how food nourishes him. A man can accept what Christ has done without knowing how it works: indeed, he certainly would not know how it works until he has accepted it.
We are told that Christ was killed for us, that his death has washed out our sins, and that by dying he disabled death itself. That is the formula. That is Christianity. …
If God was prepared to let us off, why on earth did he not do so? And what possible point could there be in punishing an innocent person instead? None at all that I can see, if you are thinking of punishment in the police-court sense. …if you think of a debt, there is plenty of point in a person who has some assets paying it on behalf…
“Footing the bill”, not “paying the penalty”. Then of course it is a matter of common experience that when one person had got himself into a hole, which the trouble of getting himself out usually falls on a kind friend.
Now what was the sort of hole man had got himself into? … Fallen man is not simply an imperfect creature who needs improvement; he is a rebel who must lay down his arms. Laying down you arms, surrendering, saying your sorry… that is the way out of the hole. This process of surrender… is what Christians call repentance. Now repentance is no fun at all. … It means killing a part of yourself under going a kind of death. In fact it needs a good man to repent [but the catch] only a bad man needs to repent: only a good person can repent perfectly. The worse you are the more you need it and the les you can do it. The only person who could do it perfectly would be the perfect person- and he would not need it.
… Can we do it with Gods help? Yes, but what do we mean when we talk of God helping us? … He lends us a little of his reasoning powers and that is how we think: he puts a little of his love in to us and that is how we love. … now if we had not fallen [it wouldn’t be a problem] … we now need Gods help in order to do something which God in his own nature never does at all- to surrender, to suffer to submit, to die. Nothing in Gods nature corresponds to this process at all. So that the one road for which we now need Gods leadership… God has never walked.
… But supposing God became a man- suppose our human nature which can suffer and die was amalgamated with God’s nature in one person- then that person can help us. He could surrender His will, and suffer and die, because He was man; and He could do it perfectly because He was God. You and I can go through this process only if God does it in us; but God can do it only if he becomes a man.
This makes the whole thing more sensible to me. I finally understand it. I’m not agreeing that is the be-all-and-all-truth, but it’s good to understand it.
This is getting very long, I know, but mostly I’m writing this to work out my thoughts. I can’t accept this as the absolute truth, which Lewis wants me to do, because I do not believe that man is ‘fallen’ and therefore I do not need to be ‘saved’ to reach salvation. I learned this from my Christian upbringing, not my pagan later years. I was taught that you are born in the likeness of God, pure and of Original Blessing not Original Sin. Even if I was to someday completely renounce my heathen ways, I would return to That Christianity, not the one Lewis believes.
I guess that’s it. He’s telling me there’s only one right way- Christianity, yet within Christianity I know there are many ways, not just his. His insistence that He knows best makes me want to kick him in the shins. I’m stubborn and in some ways immature because even way I agree with someone- if they try to push, force or insist their way is the ONLY way- I rebel.
In the pagan book the writer also makes generalizing statements that make me feel just as rebellious. She continually states. “Neo-pagan’s believe…” and even when I agree that I believe it, I know at least one or two “Neo- pagans” who don’t, so I want to shake her and say “NOT EVEYONE! You’re being to General! Only some of us to it that way, this way, or believe that” so you see what I mean.
Now I’m just babbling like Lewis, I knew that would happen, so I’ll end this rather long post.
PastorDave, I wonder what you are thinking of this book, especially chapter four, which with it’s historical look at western witchcraft is one of my favorite parts of the book. I’m interested to know what you think of that section. And all of it.
Blessings, FM
|
|
|
| |
| Shock |
| 08.10.05 (5:25 pm) [edit] |
After my encounter with the-one-who-should-have-b een-and-never-was (see last post), the day just got better and better (insert sarcasm here) while getting ready for my belly-dancing class and waiting for the hubbie to get home from work the ruler got a hold of a set of keys. These keys had a small set of those little suitcase keys on them and low and behold those, unlike regular house keys, fit very well in sockets.
Shock! And POP goes the circuit and the Ruler starts crying. Instant super mom panic sets in and although my initial reaction was to call 911, the small rational elf in my brain bit me and said, he doesn’t need an ambulance. I called another mom. She said call the nurse line. So I did. The BC Nurse Line- although they read verbatim from the BC Health Guide that’s sitting on my shelf- it’s nice to have a reassuring voice on the other end of the phone calming down panicked mums.
At this point the ruler was now calm, relaxed and back to his old self, with just the hint of a electric glow around his head. Maybe that was just my mind playing tricks on me. I don’t know, but the nurse and I agreed that even though he has no visible burns or acting like a potion of his body has gone numb having a dr. check his heart would be a good thing.
I have no idea how much of a shock the Ruler got, it was likely a small buzz, but I’m not taking any chances with my babe. The hubbie arrived home as I hang up the phone. I’m was meant to be off to class so I filled the hubbie in on the story and he’ll take the kiddo down to the clinic after he eats a bit of food.
I leave, make it four blocks and burst into tears. I don’t want to go. I need to be home. Overwhelmed and sick from all the adrenalin I turned around and head back to the house where the hubbie and the ruler are making good inroads into a grilled cheese sandwich.
We waited a long time at the clinic. The ruler’s adventure with electricity has left him more hyper that usually and he ran laps in the hall while everyone else looked at us like “this kid is sick?”. Finally we saw the dr., he’s got a three year old had home so he understands that this dr.’s visit is more for me than the ruler. He’s a great dr. checks his eyes, ears, nose, heart and blood pressure. Everything’s shipshape, no burst eardrums, no inflammation around the heart. Nothing! Just hyper-electro-boy squirming to go home to the promise of ice cream for having been so good for the Dr.
As the adrenalin high slowly wore off I crashed into my bed and my last thought of the night was, “thank goodness it’s over.”
Good night.
As it turns out the socket worked as designed and it’s likely that the full force of the current was caught up in a circuit that went from the key in the socket, to the key ring, another key, and back to the grounded socket through the screw that holds the face plate on. The ruler probably got little more than a tingly buzz. Our house is over 40 years old, up to about six weeks ago we had old un-grounded plugs in the walls. The hubbie had replaced them with grounded ones (code now, but not when the house was built) which is likely the reason the Ruler wasn’t more seriously injured.
As a side note, those little plug covers are useless in our house as the ruler just takes them out and hides them along with his other treasures, we think there’s a little magpie in him.
My public service message is CHANGE YOUR PLUGS! Make sure they’re grounded. I’m going to become a grounded electricity advocate. I’m planning a telethon for next month. Volunteers needed.
|
|
|
| |
| should have been but never was |
| 08.09.05 (1:32 pm) [edit] |
Should have been but never was.
Sometimes the oddest of things weird me out, and that’s just what happened today. My “should have been and never was” knocked on my front door today. I guess I should explain. “This guy”, I’ve known since preschool- I still have a valentine from him written in the first grade- I have a bunch of other ones from friends from back then too. There’s always been “something” about him and out friendship. I don’t know, some underlying tension of attraction that never came to fruition. In high school we hung out in the art room, sometimes he drove me home, but with his friends he didn’t know me and vice versa. It was weird and was always a stray thought in my head all through the time.
A few years after high school we kept running into each other at a bar downtown. It was random and strange, but exciting too, I was single at the time, so was he (I believe), and I finally had the confidence – or enough to drink- to tell him. But nothing came of it. I don’t know if he, like me stared at the phone for days after that chance meeting trying to work up the courage to call. I guess I should have had a few beers in those afternoons, who know what could have happened.
Nothing ever did. I started dating “this-other-guy”, and then broke up with him, and then started dating future hubbie and that was the end of it. He became titled “should have been, but never was”; I would guess that everyone has one of those in there past. I have no regrets; I have no thoughts of infidelity.
Now I run into “this guy” once a year or so, at a mutual friend’s funeral, he was walking by my house one day when I was out in the garden. He’d seen my picture in the paper with the ruler. (We’d been to a reduce tuition fees rally and how our picture taken for the paper- the ruler was nine months and I’d taped a sign to his stroller “Class of 2020, how much will I pay?” it was cool, we got our picture in the paper)
Our meetings are random, out of the ordinary. And I rarely think of him unless one of the meetings occurs. The odd thing about that is he still lives down the street from me, in his mom’s basement suite, Just like the hubbie and I did, before buying the house. You’d think we’d run into each other, but we don’t.
Back to today:
Today he knocks on the door, he saw me walking past his house with the Ruler. He wanted to find out if I was going to the reunion this fall. He wanted to talk to me about plants, he’d seen all the work I’d put into our front garden beds. He invited me over to see his garden.
The ruler was asleep, so I said we’d come over after his nap.
He has a beautiful garden. He’s put a lot of time and effort into it and I enjoyed seeing him again. Having the ruler there as a buffer meant we couldn’t stay long, or really talk, for which I’m grateful.
I tend to put sections of my life into boxes, My high school box, my witch life box, my sons life box, my ex boyfriend box, my blog box. Generally the contents of these boxes don’t intermingle. I like my life this way, keeps things from getting messy.
I firmly believe that if my hubbie box made contact with my high school one the space-time continuum would collapse bringing on ragnarok which would be a bad thing.
Today was the day for all my boxes to get pushed over. “This guy” also showed me some pictures of the sculpture work he’s done, and some of the work he’s done for the movie industry. I off hand say “oh I know another guy who done sculpture work for the movies”
“oh yeah who?”
I say the name of “this-other-guy”. “Oh yeah, I know him we chat on MSN very few days.” And boom there go some more boxes mixing up their contents again. High school box with ex boyfriend box, and now I know what the next MSN chat session is going to be about.
I don’t know why it bugs me to have this happen but it does. It weirds me out that my never-was-and-should-have -been knows my ex. The world is just too freakin’ small. I don’t want then talking about me. I just feel weird.
It feels messy, I feel this need to tidy things up. But just what those things are I’m not to sure. My world is a little out of order today and that leaves me feeling strange.
|
|
|
| |
| Racism on the internet |
| 08.09.05 (9:46 am) [edit] |
We know it's out there, we can find it if we want to look, but we never expect it to happen to us and when it does it’s a shock. A blow that sends cold chills down our spines, and makes a hard lump of our stomachs-- racism on the internet.
I'm not the victim. My friend Redtirgess is and you can visit her blog and read her story about racism.http://www.tblog.com/template...
Us bloggers, at least many of us, take pride in the Free Speech our different countries give us. We look to the blogosphere as a place where all opinions can mingle, regardless of whether we agree with them or not. So when a blog search sits discriminates because of the contents of a blog we should get riled up. We should act out about it-- write about it!
Sure, the owner of Blogflux can choose to reject peoples blogs, he has that right. But to base it on personal reasons, which from Redtigress's experience it appears to be the case, just seems wrong. And before anyone jumps on me for that statement: yes, I know Legally its not, but morally –ethically- he’s skating on the thin part of the pond. Knowing this means I will choose not to list my blog with blogflux (I’d probably be rejected anyways for my views) and I think that everyone should be aware of this event.
If, when you read this post and then Redtigress's post also agree, post at your own blog and send the message out.
|
|
|
| |
| Mere Christianity, more of me thinks... |
| 08.08.05 (5:54 am) [edit] |
PastorDave wrote(in the comments of mere christianity, chapter onehttp://www.tblog.com/template...):
Still awaiting the arrival of "Never Again The Burning Times". Hopefully it will get here early next week. You will find Lewis has some things to say about witchcraft, and probably not to your liking. It really is an aside to the theme of his book, and I encourage you not "throw out the baby with the bath".
Reply to: PastorDave
Yes, I’ve already come across a 'pagan' reference, and chosen to ignore it, because he is uneducated about 'true pagans'. He's writing about the 'old church/bible' definition, which does not apply to modern Wicca. (See Magic, Witches and the Biblehttp://www.tblog.com/template...)
Otherwise, so far I’ve been enjoying the book. I do find the rambling hard. I like the points he’s trying to make, he just takes so long to make them.
That is what's making this book a 'challenge' to read.
FM
I finished the first book, of the book and am about to venture into “What Christians believe” and I’ll be honest, I’m not looking forward to it. Not for the reason one might suppose, but because, one: I was raised Christian and so I already know what Christians believe- at least my churches version- and two, CS takes so long to describe his ideas and points it gets annoying.
I understand that he’s writing to the masses and trying to make his points understandable to the undereducated, but as an educated person I feel condescended too. I mentioned before that he started off, explaining without a condescending air, but that seems to be gone, and he’s speaking to his readers as if they have no education period. Considering that these works were originally radio broadcasts, I suppose it makes sense. People who normally would not read a lot, or didn’t have access to books of ‘higher learning’ were his intended audience.
Yet, I just can’t shake the feeling of his smugness regarding his ‘insights’ into religion. I may just be reading into it, but his tone implies that he, as a Christian who’s made all these realisations, is better than me, and the rest of his audience. There’s a tone of arrogance that makes the reading hard.
Again I say, the points that he’s skirting around; the belief that there is a higher power that guides and directs our moral behaviour I do agree with. I would use different terminology to talk about it, but that’s semantics, and we won’t go there right now.
So far so good, we’ll see how I feel after I’m re-educated with “What Christians believe.” I say re-educated because I feel, from the pervious section, he’s going to tell me that what I thought Christians believed, isn’t true at all, and “THIS” is what they “REALLY” believe. But I’m making a big assumption and I hope I’m proved wrong.
FM
|
|
|
| |
| Golden Rules |
| 08.05.05 (2:16 pm) [edit] |
I stole this from another blog:
The Universal Golden Rule
Brahmanism This is the sum of duty: do naught unto others which would cause you pain if done to you. [Mahabharata 5,1517]
Buddhism Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful. [Udana-Varga 5,18]
Christianity Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law of the prophets. [Matthew 7:12]
Confucianism Surely it is the maxim of loving-kindness: Do not unto others that you would not have them do unto you. [Analects 15,23]
Islam No one of you is a believer until he desires for his brother that which he desires for himself. [Sunnah]
Judaism What is hateful to you, do not to your fellowmen. That is the entire Law; all the rest is commentary. [Talmud Shabbat 31a]
Taoism Regard your neighbor's gain as your own gain and your neighbor's loss as your own loss. [T'ai Shang Kan Ying P'ien]
Wicca An' it harm none, do as ye will. [Rede] Any energy you send out will come back threefold. [The Law of Three]
Zoroastrianism That nature alone is good which refrains from doing unto another whatsoever is not good for itself. [Dadistan-i-dinik 94-5]
So what do you think? Is this a universal spiritual truth of god, or is it common sense?
|
|
|
| |
| mere christianity, chapter one, me thinks... |
| 08.04.05 (5:20 am) [edit] |
Mere Christianity Chapter 1, The law of human nature.
First off, I accidentally got a Large print edition of the book from the library so the font is twice the regular size of a normal book. My eyes are having a hard time adjusting.
Second, CS Lewis is a babbler. He takes a very long time to get to a point. He does so because he’s writing as if his reader has no clue to what he’s talking about. So he describes everything in detail. He’s not condescending in anyway, but I find I ‘see’ where he’s going well before he gets there. This is going to hamper how I read the rest of the book.
Third, I’m concerned that my writing will be influenced by this and I’ll babble more than I normally do.
In the first chapter Lewis is describing “human nature” and the basic moral code of conduct that in general humans follow. I completely and utter agree with his statements that humans instinctively know the ‘proper’ ways to act regardless of their cultural differences. Details of these codes differ, example: man can only have one wife, in some cultures, and in others four. BUT in each culture man knows he can’t just walk into the street and grab any woman he wants.
In a basic sense we all understand the difference between right and wrong. And he then go on to state that we do not follow these codes. He suggests by the fact that we will break the code we are showing its truth. I liked this part, “A nation may say treaties don’t matter; but then, next minute, they spoil their case by saying that the particular treaty they want to break was an unfair one. BUT (my emphasis) if treaties do not matter, and if there is no such thing as right and wrong – in other words, if there is no law of nature- what is the difference between a fair treaty and an unfair one?”
“There many be all sorts of excuses for us [to break the code]. That time you were so unfair to the children was when you were very tired… and what you promised to do for old so-and-so and have never done- well, you never would have promised if you had known how frightfully busy you were going to be.”
I like what he’s saying here, and I’m interested to see where he’s going to go and how he’s going to bring Christianity into this discourse. I get the feeling that at some point he’s going to say that only Christians are capable of following this code and that only through Christianity can we really truly follow what is right and dismiss the wrong. I don’t know for sure, though, but I feel it there as an undertone.
I agree with Lewis’s comments about humanity, but I don’t see religion fitting into is argument in anyway. We, as humans regardless of our faiths can follow morals and have ethics. I’ve heard it debated before in Christian forums that some Christians do not believe non-Christians capable of moral behavior and that arrogance and ignorance really bothers me. I would be greatly saddened if this argument comes up in his writing.
Anyways I’m digressing here, I have no idea, so far, where Lewis is going with his statements, and I am looking forward to continuing this book. We’ll see.
FM
|
|
|
| |
| next available representative will be with you shortly... |
| 08.03.05 (12:29 pm) [edit] |
In an effort to "get on top of things" I’ve spent most of the day replying to email I should have last week, filling out tardy medical claim forms (can you believe I used the word tardy?) mailed late birthday presents and thank you cards, and organised three play days for the Ruler next week, and two for myself :D
I've figured out my -school- belly dancing class- bible study-YES bible study! - schedule for the fall and well just tried to catch up. If you're waiting for an email from me, please be patient you're in the queue, you've been given a number and the next available representative will be with you shortly...
oh and I've gotten the Book for PastorDaves book swap... just need to find time to read it!
did i mention i need to be able to type 55 words a minute by december?
FM
|
|
|
| |
| dry mark eraser pens and two year olds |
| 08.02.05 (4:43 am) [edit] |
just some updats on my life, cuz i can't think of anything better to write:
The Rulers Second Birthday part Last weekend was a smash hit! we had a great time, and other than the ruler spending most of the party by himself in the yard, everyone had a good time. Sometimes he ruler just needs some me time.
He got some pretty great presents and now my house if full of trucks, cars and Dora the explorer books.
My folks returned home on wednesday last week. I didn't kill them! yippee! and i do miss them.
But upon arriving home discovered the the Ruler had a high fever. it lasted a day, then i got sick, then on Sat the hubbie got sick, and it was the land of infection and crumbs! all weekend at our house. We're all on the mend today and feeling much better.
uuummmm as of this moment the ruler is walking around the livingroom in my running shoes.
He got this great book that is a board book with shiny pages. it has a dry mark eraser pen with it so that he can draw right on the book then erase what he draws. Its a book about numbers and learning numbers, very cool, but now the ruler is Armed! and that frightens me a little.
uummmm that's about it i think.
FM
|
|
|
| |
| The Book Swap Challenge |
| 08.01.05 (6:47 am) [edit] |
So over at PastorDaves http://www.tblog.com/template... blog he's got this Book Swap challenge going on. He's asking people to suggest books for him to read (spiritual in nature) and in return he will suggest a book in return. Always one for a challenge and because I love to read I jumped on it. My book suggestion to Dave was "Never Again, The Burning Times, Paganism Revived" by Loretta Orion. I've talked about this book before. It's a very unbiased look at Paganism, Loretta is an anthropologist.
Aside from the atrocious title, it really sucks; the book is well written and gives an honest opinion of modern day pagans. Hence a worth while read if you are interested in "just what the heck is the pagan thing all about"
I wasn't sure if he'd take the challenge of reading this book, so I also suggested a few others, which I hope in time we can also look at together. But PastorDave rocks and he's taking up the challenge of reading a book that is going to affect the way he looks at paganism. I don't doubt that this book will open his eyes. What he chooses to do with that information will, of course, be up to him.
I don't know him very well so I don't know how accepting he is, or if he'll throw the book across the room in frustration and anger at these crazy heathens who refuse to accept Jesus. As I said I don't know him well enough yet, to suggest an opinion of him reaction.
I am truly looking forward to rereading this book to discuss with him, and as a result get to know him better.
The book that he has suggested to me is "Mere Christianity" by C.S. Lewis. My library has a few copies and I’ll be getting one in the next day or too. I love my library, they have so many books and have a great system where I can find books on the internet then reserve them so all I have to do is go to the checkout desk and bit them up! A wonderful service when you have a two year old, who'd rather play in the elevator than wait for mummy to find her books.
I'm looking forward to reading this book. Pastor Dave respects it and I will read it with as much respect as well. I'll admit it; I’ve never read anything by C.S Lewis. Not even Narnia. I know, I know, get on with it.
When I was young for whatever reason they didn't appeal, which is strange considering how much I loved (still do) fantasy, and fairy tale. I have the box set. It's been on my shelf since I was about 13. But I never picked them up. Now I figured I'd wait until my son was old enough and we'd read them together.
So off we go on a Book challenge. Anyone interested in joining this challenge talk to myself or Pastor Dave. I'm wondering if we should start a forum somewhere to keep track of the books we're all reading? Pastor Dave is about to hit overload I think. What do you think Dave?
Oh the other books I suggested for read are: The Coming of the Cosmic Christ, by Matthew Fox The Pagan Christ, By Tom Harpur Why Christianity Must Change or Die, by John Spong.
Anyone interested in reading (rereading) these books with me, let me know.
FM
|
|
|
| |
|
Demystifying Misconceptions
This Blog chronicles the journey of one woman as she attempts to define her faith and place in the universe.
I'm a geeky sort of Fae most of the time
Blog Posts of Note:
*Christian and Wiccan at The Same Time
*A Walk with Jesus’ Mom
*Finding God in Wicca
*Universal Myth and Personal Myth- Definitions in Consensus Reality
The Matrix: Systems Healing and Thinking, an Introduction
*Magic, Witches and the Bible
*A brief History of Wicca
*Wicca 101 part 1
*Wicca 101 part 2
*Spells and the Modern Witch
*Do Witches Worship Satan?
*Religious View
*Interview with a Witch
*A Witch's Story of Creation
*One Definition of the Divine
*I am a Witch
* Original Sin, from a Witches point of View
*Why a Witch Could care less about Harry Potter
*Satan is not my Sidekick
*The other people: Or how I learned to stop worrying and love the Bible
|